Home

QuantumRelativity.com
Classical Electromagnetism
Chapter 3: Maxwell's Equations
by Mark Lawrence

Football
Investing
Motorcycles
Neural Networks


Home

Articles
Calculus
Electromagnetism
Relativity
Physical Units
Space-Time Part I:
  Curved Space-Time
Space-Time Part II:
  Black Holes

References

Links

Art

Quotes

Recipes
Al Pastor
Carnitas
Frijoles: Refried Beans
Shrimp Burritos
Shrimp Enchiladas
Spanish Rice

Cioppino
Calzone or Pizza

Korma Chicken
Kung Pao Shrimp
Thai Chicken and Bamboo

Killer Shrimp
Seafood Chowder
Salmon
Grilled Shrimp
Spicy Tuna Herb Salad

Wisconsin Bratwurst
Cole Slaw
Soup with Dumplings
Garlic Cheese Sauce
Hot Garlic Butter
Greek Salad
Leg of Lamb

Chocolate Truffles
Quick Chocolate Sauce

Cups-tsp-tbl-ml

I recommend FireFox
Maxwell's, Poisson's and Laplace's Equations

Electromagnetism in a nutshell

In about 1860, James Clerk Maxwell summarized and completed the knowledge of electromagnetism with his theory, Maxwell's Equations:

Ñ · E = ρ

Ñ x E = - dB / dt

Ñ · B = 0

Ñ x B = J - dE / dt

About 20 years later, Lorentz wrote down the force equation,

F = q(E + v x B)

Today we usually note that Maxwell's Equations can be simplified by using a scalar potential φ and a vector potential A,

E = -Ñφ - dΑ/dt

B = Ñ x A

resulting in

Ñ2φ  - 1 / c2 d2φ / dt2 = -ρ

Ñ2A  - 1 / c2 d2A/ dt2 = -J

Einstein recognized that these equations could be put into one equation by combining φ and A into a four vector, and ρ and J into another four vector, resulting in

Aμ,νν - Aν,μν = Jμ

That's it then, all of electromagnetism in one simple equation. Well, perhaps there's just a little more to discuss about this subject.

We'll start with electrostatics, the theory of electricity when nothing is changing in time. This means that all the time derivatives are zero, and we won't consider any magnetic fields. In this case, all we need is Poisson's equation,

Ñ2Φ  = -ρ

or if there are no charges present, LaPlace's equation

Ñ2Φ  = 0

It will turn out that these exceedingly simply equations have fantastically rich solutions. It will also turn out we will only be able to solve them in a few particular circumstances, circumstances which include enough symmetry and other simplifications so that we can make huge simplifying assumptions.




dψ'  = ih eiχ(x,t) (

) = ih eiχ(x,t) ( d

)
ih

 +
ψ

+


dt
dt

dt
dt

dt

-h2 d2ψ'

-h2 eiχ(x,t)(
d2ψ

d2χ ) = -h2 eiχ(x,t) ( d

)2 ψ


 =


 + 2


 + ψ


+

2m
dx2

2m
dx2
dx
dx

dx2 2m
dx

dx




Copyright © 2002-2005 Mark Lawrence. All rights reserved. Reproduction is strictly prohibited.

Email me, mark@calsci.com, with suggestions, additions, broken links.
Revised Friday, 22-Apr-2005 17:06:52 PDT