Siméon Denis Poisson, 1781 to 1840 |
Pierre-Simon Laplace, 1749 to 1827 |
In this chapter we'll be working in cylindrical coordinates. We'll look for solutions to Laplace's equation. Later we'll apply boundary conditions to find specific solutions. Traditionally, ρ is used for the radius variable in cylindrical coordinates, but in electrodynamics we use ρ for the charge density, so we'll use s for the radius. φ will be the angular dimension, and z the third dimension.
s lies in the x-y plane, an angle φ up from the x axis. The relevant equations are:
x = s cos φ
y = s sin φ z = z | s = √ (x2 + y2)
φ = arctan(y/x) z = z |
Laplace's equation for the potential in the absence of sources is:
Ñ2Φ = 0
Ñ2 in cylindrical coordinates is:
1 | ∂ | ∂ | 1 | ∂2 | ∂2 | |||||
Ñ2 | = | s | + | + | ||||||
s | ∂s | ∂s | s2 | ∂φ2 | ∂z2 |
First we'll solve a pseudo two dimensional problem. We'll presume the given geometry extends infinitely in the z direction, so that the solution does not depend on z. We'll also presume that our solution is separable, that is Φ( s, φ, z ) = S(s)Q(φ). We can check the separability assumption later. Laplace's equation is a second order differential equation, so if we find two unique solutions we've done it. Generally speaking, if the boundary conditions are separable, there's a good chance the solution is separable. If the boundary conditions are not separable, most likely we're hosed. Now,
Ñ2Φ(s,φ,z) = Ñ2S(s)Q(φ).
Q is independent of s, so it can be pulled through the s partial derivatives. Similarly S is independent of φ, so it can be pulled through the φ partial derivatives. Φ is independent of z, so the z partial derivatives are 0.
Q | ∂ | ∂ | S | ∂2 | ||||||
Ñ2SQ | = | s | S + | Q | = 0 | |||||
s | ∂s | ∂s | s2 | ∂φ2 |
Now multiply the entire equation by s2 / SQ:
s | ∂ | ∂ | 1 | ∂2 | ||||||
Ñ2SQ | = | s | S + | Q | = 0 | |||||
S | ∂s | ∂s | Q | ∂φ2 |
Since there's an expression that depends only on s and another that depends only on φ, and since the sum is zero for all s and φ, it must be that the individual expressions are constants. We'll start by setting them to 0.
s | ∂ | ∂ | ∂ | ∂ | ∂S | ||||||||
s | S | = 0 = | s | S | Þ | = | |||||||
S | ∂s | ∂s | ∂s | ∂s | ∂s | s |
1 | ∂2 | ∂2Q | ||
Q | = 0 = | |||
Q | ∂φ2 | ∂φ2 |
We can solve these immediately. S = a0 + b0 ln s. Q = A0 + B0 φ.
Another possibility is that the expression for S is equal to some constant, and the expression for Q is equal to the negative of that same constant. Since these are second order equations, we'll anticipate and set the constant to η2. Now,
s | ∂ | ∂ | ∂ | ∂ | ||||||
s | S | = η2 Þ s | s | S | = η2 S | |||||
S | ∂s | ∂s | ∂s | ∂s |
∂2 | ||
Q | = -η2Q | |
∂φ2 |
We can solve the second equation immediately. Q = Aη cos ηφ + Bη sin ηφ.
For the equation in S, we'll try a polynomial sα. Immediately we see that the solutions to this equation are S = aηsη + b ηs-η.
We've arbitrarily put the plus sign on the S expression, and the minus sign on the Q expression. Let's see what happens if we reverse this.
s | ∂ | ∂ | ∂ | ∂ | ||||||
s | S | = -η2 Þ s | s | S | = -η2 S | |||||
S | ∂s | ∂s | ∂s | ∂s |
∂2 | ||
Q | = η2Q | |
∂φ2 |
Again, we can solve the Q equation immediately - this is just eηφ and e -ηφ. We'll choose to represent the solutions as Q = Aη cosh ηφ + Bη sinh ηφ.
The S equation is a bit trickier. Again, we'll try a polynomial sα. Immediately we see that the solutions to this equation are S = aηsiη + bηs-iη. This is not very pleasant, so we'll work on these solutions a bit. siη = e iη ln s. This suggests, perhaps "obviously" in retrospect, that we should have tried cos( η ln s ). So, our solutions to the equation will be
S = aη cos( η ln s ) + bη sin( η ln s ).
These solutions oscillate - unlike the solutions for S above, which are strictly non-negative, these solutions are both positive and negative. Both the Q and the S solutions are either symmetric or anti-symmetric, so we can assign these solutions to negative values of η and any minus sign will be absorbed into the coefficients. Similarly, the other solutions we got were either symmetric or anti-symmetric, so we can assign those solutions to the positive values of η.
Now, our complete solution to the 2d + z Laplace equation is:
-1 | ∞ | |||||||
Φ | = | Σ | (aη cos( η ln s ) + bη sin( η ln s )) | (Aη cosh ηφ + Bη sinh ηφ ) + | Σ | ( aηsη + bηs-η ) | ( Aη cos ηφ + Bη sin ηφ ) + | (a0 + b0 ln s) (A0 + B0φ) |
-∞ | 1 |
Suppose we have conductor filling all of space except for a wedge cut out of it. OK, this is a pretty artificial problem. Unfortunately, artificial problems are pretty much what we can actually solve. Importantly, if you had a piece of metal with a wedge cut out of it, this solution would be quite accurate as long as you were reasonable far from the edges.
Figure 5.1: A boundary value problem
Suppose the metal is at a potential V. Now, we have three boundary conditions:
Condition 1 tells us:
aη = bη = 0 for η < 0, as the sine and cosine functions are not well behaved as their arguments go to minus infinity.
bη = 0 for η > 0, as otherwise we have a rather embarrassing divide by zero.
b0 = 0 or we have another embarrassing infinity
B0 = because the constant term must be independent of φ.
a0 A0 = V
Now our remaining solution is:
∞ | |||||
Φ | = | Σ | ( aηsη ) | ( Aη cos ηφ + Bη sin ηφ ) + | V |
1 |
Condition 2 tells us:
Aη = 0, otherwise the voltage on the lower face will be a function of s. We could have set aη to 0 instead, but this takes all the fun out of the solution.
Condition 3 tells us:
ηβ = nπ, n integer.
Now, our complete solution is:
∞ | ||||
Φ | = V + | Σ | ansnπ/β | sin( nπφ/β ) |
1 |
Now let's have a closer look at this solution. If s is very small, then we can ignore all the terms with n > 1. The electric field is E = -ÑΦ, which is
E = -a1 s(π/β-1) ( sin πφ/β s + cos πφ/β φ )
As φ goes to 0, E goes to -a1 s(<π/β-1) = 4πσ.
Immediately we see that if β < π, E -> 0; if β > pi;, E -> ∞. This is the well known result that the electric field and charge density go to zero at an inside corner, and they go to infinity at a point. This is why lightning rods work: the lightning is attracted to the very high field at a point on an object. We should not be too concerned by the infinity - after all, there's no such thing as an infinitely sharp point.